Post available to Premium Members only. Please upgrade your account in order to apply.
The Case of Rwanda is a very shady memory for the UN. A genocide took place in front of the UN and nothing was done. The "action" the UN too is the CPI, which does not work as it should.. One year ago, I debated the issue of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where I found out that the CPI has like (the numbers aren't 100% real but similar to reality) 8 suspectss for judging. Let's say that from those 8, four are still on the loose The other four were taken to court, of which 2 already are dead and the others do not have a senctence yet. As the CPI isn't effective for DRC, it is also neither effective for Rwanda, and perhaps it won't be for anyone in a few years' time. The only thing I say to this is: Why?
Whenever I researched for a MUN, everything the UN did as for the issue had to always begin with "Called for" or "Condemned" or "Invited" or "Exhorted", or "Categorized". In crude terms, this is just bullshit. Naming something illegal won't make any justice. It would be another world if just by saying "Hey, that's illegal" crime would stop, wouldn't it? But UN keeps on calling for peace instead of stopping war. The UN keeps on condemning crimes instead of taking to justice the perpetrators. There's something called International Law, something should be applied to everyone and not just used as a reference during a High School MUN.
This year, as Chile, as I said, I won't suggest solutions; I will give choices. I put myself into the shoes of Chile and Yemen for this WIMUN. The Saudi Coalition, which is made up of around 10 countries, is bombing Yemen to kill the insurgency. However, civilians are dying. This year, for me, the only solution is to stop the Coalition. I don't care it has 10 countries and it is not diplomatic. If civilians are dying, what these 10 countries are doing is illegal and completely deplorable. This is the fist of steel the UN should have. If people are dying, there's no political principle that weighs more than the lives of these people. See it this way: Yemen is a wound and the UN is the immune system. The immune system is only cleaning diagnosing the wound and perhaps fighting bacteria around it, but it doesn't let the wound to close, just because fighting bacteria inside the wound is "politically incorrect". If the UN wanted peace that much, it would instantly forbid the coalition who violates international law and put everyone in their place. The soft hand of the UN should be in UNICEF, but the steel fist must be in the Security Council.